AVSE vs SPGM
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. AVSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2,985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVSE | SPGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $221M | $1.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.81% | |
| Holdings | 2,438 | 2,985 | |
| YTD Return | +19.05% | +15.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.25% | +25.49% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.75% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -34.0% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2022 | Feb 27, 2012 |
AVSE vs SPGM Performance
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year AVSE returned +33.25% while SPGM returned +25.49%. Year to date, AVSE is up 19.05% versus a gain of 15.41% for SPGM.
Over three years, AVSE compounded at +23.75% per year against +21.81% for SPGM. Across the full 4-year window we track, AVSE has the edge at +13.62% annualized vs +9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 13.7% for SPGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for AVSE and -34.0% for SPGM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVSE charges 0.33% per year while SPGM charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $9 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVSE currently yields 2.16% against 1.81% for SPGM.
Holdings Overlap
AVSE and SPGM share 315 holdings out of 4058 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVSE or SPGM?
AVSE has an expense ratio of 0.33% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVSE or SPGM?
Over the past year AVSE returned +33.25% vs +25.49% for SPGM, so AVSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AVSE annualized +13.62% vs +9.95% for SPGM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVSE or SPGM?
AVSE has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 13.7% for SPGM. Worst drawdown: AVSE -26.3% vs SPGM -34.0%.
Should I hold both AVSE and SPGM?
AVSE and SPGM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVSE and SPGM?
AVSE and SPGM share 315 common holdings with a 5.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4058 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVSE or SPGM?
AVSE yields 2.16% while SPGM yields 1.81%, so AVSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.