FLGV vs HCOM
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. FLGV delivered stronger 1-year returns. HCOM offers more diversification with 55 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | -0.78% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.19% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.28% | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.50% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Commodity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2020 | Sep 14, 2021 |
FLGV vs HCOM Performance
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year FLGV returned +1.19% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, FLGV is down 0.78% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Over three years, FLGV compounded at +3.28% per year against -6.95% for HCOM. Across the full 4-year window we track, HCOM has the edge at +0.68% annualized vs -0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for FLGV and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGV charges 0.09% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $59 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGV currently yields 4.11% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGV or HCOM?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while HCOM charges 0.59%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGV or HCOM?
Over the past year FLGV returned +1.19% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so FLGV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FLGV annualized -0.96% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGV or HCOM?
HCOM has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: FLGV -18.4% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both FLGV and HCOM?
FLGV and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGV or HCOM?
FLGV yields 4.11% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.