FLGV vs HUSV
FLGV vs HUSV
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. HUSV delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $74M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 1.37% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | -0.55% | +8.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.27% | +5.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.06% | +9.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.55% | +6.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2020 | Aug 24, 2016 |
FLGV vs HUSV Performance
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FLGV returned +1.27% while HUSV returned +5.89%. Year to date, FLGV is down 0.55% versus a gain of 8.58% for HUSV.
Over three years, FLGV compounded at +3.06% per year against +9.95% for HUSV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.55% and +6.22% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, HUSV has the edge at +8.52% annualized vs -0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for FLGV and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGV charges 0.09% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $70 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGV currently yields 4.11% against 1.37% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
FLGV and HUSV share 0 holdings out of 142 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGV or HUSV?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while HUSV charges 0.70%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGV or HUSV?
Over the past year FLGV returned +1.27% vs +5.89% for HUSV, so HUSV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FLGV annualized -0.92% vs +8.52% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGV or HUSV?
HUSV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: FLGV -18.4% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both FLGV and HUSV?
FLGV and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGV and HUSV?
FLGV and HUSV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 142 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGV or HUSV?
FLGV yields 4.11% while HUSV yields 1.37%, so FLGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.