FMN vs INCE
FMN vs INCE
Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund vs Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
Quick Verdict
INCE has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. FMN offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMN | INCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $16M | $132M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.29% | 4.82% | |
| Holdings | 150 | 82 | |
| YTD Return | +3.51% | +15.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.90% | +26.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.05% | +16.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.30% | +10.93% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4% | -34.1% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2002 | Sep 20, 2016 |
FMN vs INCE Performance
Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year FMN returned +9.90% while INCE returned +26.30%. Year to date, FMN is up 3.51% versus a gain of 15.94% for INCE.
Over three years, FMN compounded at +7.05% per year against +16.63% for INCE; over five years the annualized figures are -2.30% and +10.93% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, INCE has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs -0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for FMN and -34.1% for INCE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMN charges 0.75% per year while INCE charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $29 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMN currently yields 4.29% against 4.82% for INCE.
Holdings Overlap
FMN and INCE share 0 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMN or INCE?
FMN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while INCE charges 0.29%. INCE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMN or INCE?
Over the past year FMN returned +9.90% vs +26.30% for INCE, so INCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FMN annualized -0.21% vs +12.53% for INCE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMN or INCE?
FMN has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: FMN -53.4% vs INCE -34.1%.
Should I hold both FMN and INCE?
FMN and INCE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMN and INCE?
FMN and INCE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMN or INCE?
FMN yields 4.29% while INCE yields 4.82%, so INCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.