FMN vs IZRL
Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. IZRL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FMN offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMN | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $16M | $142M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.29% | 2.55% | |
| Holdings | 150 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +3.14% | -0.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.79% | +13.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.65% | +15.28% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.48% | -0.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2002 | Dec 4, 2017 |
FMN vs IZRL Performance
Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year FMN returned +8.79% while IZRL returned +13.90%. Year to date, FMN is up 3.14% versus a loss of 0.89% for IZRL.
Over three years, FMN compounded at +6.65% per year against +15.28% for IZRL; over five years the annualized figures are -2.48% and -0.02% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IZRL has the edge at +5.38% annualized vs -0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 14.7% for FMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for FMN and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMN charges 0.75% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $49 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMN currently yields 4.29% against 2.55% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
FMN and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMN or IZRL?
FMN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMN or IZRL?
Over the past year FMN returned +8.79% vs +13.90% for IZRL, so IZRL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FMN annualized -0.22% vs +5.38% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMN or IZRL?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 14.7% for FMN. Worst drawdown: FMN -53.4% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both FMN and IZRL?
FMN and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMN and IZRL?
FMN and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMN or IZRL?
FMN yields 4.29% while IZRL yields 2.55%, so FMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.