FMN vs NMI

Quick Verdict

NMI has a lower expense ratio. NMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. NMI offers more diversification with 95 holdings.

Lower Fees: NMIHigher Returns: NMIMore Diversified: NMI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFMNNMIWinner
Expense Ratio0.75%0.73%
AUM$16M-
Dividend Yield4.29%4.57%
Holdings150220
YTD Return+3.51%+11.08%
1Y Return+9.90%+14.95%
3Y Return (annualized)+7.05%+9.79%
5Y Return (annualized)-2.30%+2.16%
Volatility (annualized)14.7%11.0%
Max Drawdown-53.4%-34.4%
Fund FamilyFederated HermesNuveen
CategoryTax PreferredTax Preferred
InceptionDec 20, 2002Apr 20, 1988

FMN vs NMI Performance

Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc. (NMI) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year FMN returned +9.90% while NMI returned +14.95%. Year to date, FMN is up 3.51% versus a gain of 11.08% for NMI.

Over three years, FMN compounded at +7.05% per year against +9.79% for NMI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.30% and +2.16% respectively. Across the full 24-year window we track, NMI has the edge at +0.38% annualized vs -0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 11.0% for NMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for FMN and -34.4% for NMI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FMN charges 0.75% per year while NMI charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $73 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMN currently yields 4.29% against 4.57% for NMI.

Holdings Overlap

3.8%overlap

FMN and NMI share 8 holdings out of 172 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FMNWeight in NMIDifference
PR PRCGEN 5 07/01/203.45%0.84%2.61%
IL ILS 5.5 10/01/2042.16%0.94%1.22%
PR PRCGEN 4.75 07/011.96%0.42%1.54%
NY NYCDEV 5 11/15/20ProProPro
NY MTATRN 5.25 11/15ProProPro
VA VBHDEV 7 09/01/20ProProPro
FL LKRGEN 6.12 05/01ProProPro
VA JAMDEV 6.88 12/01ProProPro
See all 8 holdings FMN shares with NMI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FMN or NMI?

FMN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while NMI charges 0.73%. NMI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FMN or NMI?

Over the past year FMN returned +9.90% vs +14.95% for NMI, so NMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (24 years), FMN annualized -0.21% vs +0.38% for NMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FMN or NMI?

FMN has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 11.0% for NMI. Worst drawdown: FMN -53.4% vs NMI -34.4%.

Should I hold both FMN and NMI?

FMN and NMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FMN and NMI?

FMN and NMI share 8 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 172 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FMN or NMI?

FMN yields 4.29% while NMI yields 4.57%, so NMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →