FTGS vs INCE
FTGS vs INCE
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
Quick Verdict
INCE has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 50 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | INCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $132M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 4.82% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 82 | |
| YTD Return | +12.49% | +15.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.75% | +26.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.25% | +16.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.93% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -34.1% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2022 | Sep 20, 2016 |
FTGS vs INCE Performance
First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year FTGS returned +14.75% while INCE returned +26.30%. Year to date, FTGS is up 12.49% versus a gain of 15.94% for INCE.
Over three years, FTGS compounded at +18.25% per year against +16.63% for INCE. Across the full 4-year window we track, FTGS has the edge at +19.84% annualized vs +12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for FTGS and -34.1% for INCE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTGS charges 0.60% per year while INCE charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $29 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTGS currently yields 0.09% against 4.82% for INCE.
Holdings Overlap
FTGS and INCE share 1 holdings out of 96 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTGS | Weight in INCE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHW | 2.15% | 0.50% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTGS or INCE?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while INCE charges 0.29%. INCE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTGS or INCE?
Over the past year FTGS returned +14.75% vs +26.30% for INCE, so INCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTGS annualized +19.84% vs +12.53% for INCE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTGS or INCE?
FTGS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: FTGS -20.0% vs INCE -34.1%.
Should I hold both FTGS and INCE?
FTGS and INCE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTGS and INCE?
FTGS and INCE share 1 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 96 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTGS or INCE?
FTGS yields 0.09% while INCE yields 4.82%, so INCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.