FTGS vs IZRL
FTGS vs IZRL
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IZRL offers more diversification with 66 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $142M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 2.55% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +12.49% | -0.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.75% | +13.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.25% | +15.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +0.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2022 | Dec 4, 2017 |
FTGS vs IZRL Performance
First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year FTGS returned +14.75% while IZRL returned +13.01%. Year to date, FTGS is up 12.49% versus a loss of 0.27% for IZRL.
Over three years, FTGS compounded at +18.25% per year against +15.44% for IZRL. Across the full 4-year window we track, FTGS has the edge at +19.84% annualized vs +5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 14.6% for FTGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for FTGS and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTGS charges 0.60% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $49 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTGS currently yields 0.09% against 2.55% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
FTGS and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 116 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTGS or IZRL?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTGS or IZRL?
Over the past year FTGS returned +14.75% vs +13.01% for IZRL, so FTGS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTGS annualized +19.84% vs +5.46% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTGS or IZRL?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 14.6% for FTGS. Worst drawdown: FTGS -20.0% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both FTGS and IZRL?
FTGS and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTGS and IZRL?
FTGS and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 116 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTGS or IZRL?
FTGS yields 0.09% while IZRL yields 2.55%, so IZRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.