GTOS vs HCOM
GTOS vs HCOM
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. GTOS delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 294 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $122M | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.55% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 1,047 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | -0.89% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.16% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.51% | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Commodity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Sep 14, 2021 |
GTOS vs HCOM Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year GTOS returned +1.16% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.89% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.51% per year against -6.95% for HCOM. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.30% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $59 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.55% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or HCOM?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while HCOM charges 0.59%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or HCOM?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.16% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so GTOS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.30% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or HCOM?
HCOM has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both GTOS and HCOM?
GTOS and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or HCOM?
GTOS yields 4.55% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.