GTOS vs KF
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs The Korea Fund, Inc.
Quick Verdict
KF delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 294 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | KF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | - | |
| AUM | $122M | $285M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.55% | 1.57% | |
| Holdings | 1,047 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | -0.81% | +64.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.12% | +130.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.64% | +44.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 43.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -77.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Aug 29, 1984 |
GTOS vs KF Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is a ETF from The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF). Over the past year GTOS returned +1.12% while KF returned +130.85%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.81% versus a gain of 64.67% for KF.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.64% per year against +44.19% for KF. Across the full 4-year window we track, KF has the edge at +16.48% annualized vs +4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.4% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -77.0% for KF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and KF share 0 holdings out of 343 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, GTOS or KF?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.12% vs +130.85% for KF, so KF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.31% vs +16.48% for KF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or KF?
KF has been the more volatile fund at 43.4% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs KF -77.0%.
Should I hold both GTOS and KF?
GTOS and KF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and KF?
GTOS and KF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 343 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or KF?
GTOS yields 4.55% while KF yields 1.57%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.