IG vs PHDG
IG vs PHDG
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. PHDG delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 494 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | PHDG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $198M | $61M | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 1.68% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 514 | |
| YTD Return | -1.54% | +13.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.84% | +18.49% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.56% | +9.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.69% | +4.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0% | 9.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -23.6% | |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2018 | Dec 5, 2012 |
IG vs PHDG Performance
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IG returned +0.84% while PHDG returned +18.49%. Year to date, IG is down 1.54% versus a gain of 13.02% for PHDG.
Over three years, IG compounded at +4.56% per year against +9.60% for PHDG; over five years the annualized figures are -0.69% and +4.75% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, PHDG has the edge at +4.45% annualized vs +0.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PHDG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 8.0% for IG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for IG and -23.6% for PHDG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IG charges 0.19% per year while PHDG charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $39 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IG currently yields 5.07% against 1.68% for PHDG.
Holdings Overlap
IG and PHDG share 0 holdings out of 639 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IG or PHDG?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while PHDG charges 0.39%. IG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IG or PHDG?
Over the past year IG returned +0.84% vs +18.49% for PHDG, so PHDG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IG annualized +0.59% vs +4.45% for PHDG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IG or PHDG?
PHDG has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 8.0% for IG. Worst drawdown: IG -23.8% vs PHDG -23.6%.
Should I hold both IG and PHDG?
IG and PHDG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IG and PHDG?
IG and PHDG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 639 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IG or PHDG?
IG yields 5.07% while PHDG yields 1.68%, so IG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.