IG vs SAWS
IG vs SAWS
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 145 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $198M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | -1.54% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.84% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.56% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.69% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2018 | Jul 30, 2024 |
IG vs SAWS Performance
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year IG returned +0.84% while SAWS returned +25.78%. Year to date, IG is down 1.54% versus a gain of 16.18% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 8.0% for IG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for IG and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IG charges 0.19% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $55 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IG currently yields 5.07% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
IG and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 216 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IG or SAWS?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while SAWS charges 0.55%. IG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IG or SAWS?
Over the past year IG returned +0.84% vs +25.78% for SAWS, so SAWS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IG annualized +0.59% vs +13.57% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IG or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 8.0% for IG. Worst drawdown: IG -23.8% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both IG and SAWS?
IG and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IG and SAWS?
IG and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 216 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IG or SAWS?
IG yields 5.07% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so IG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.