In asset management, cost is one of the few variables you can control. For ETFs, the primary cost is the expense ratio. But simply finding the lowest fee isn't always the smartest move. The real question is: what are you getting for that fee?
What is an ETF expense ratio? It's an annual fee, expressed as a percentage of the fund's assets, that covers the fund's operating expenses. This includes management fees, administrative costs, and other operational expenses.
How do ETF fees work? The fee is deducted from the fund's assets daily. You never see a bill; the cost is directly reflected in the fund's performance. This seemingly small percentage can have a massive, corrosive effect on long-term returns.
For professionals, analyzing this fee requires answering two questions:
- What is the fee?
- Is it justified?
Here is how to answer both directly in Excel.
Step 1: Quantify the Cost
Before you can analyze, you must quantify. You can pull the expense ratio for any ETF directly into your spreadsheet using your MarketXLS function (e.g., MarketXLS_ExpenseRatio).
=MarketXLS_ExpenseRatio("QQQ")
This gives you an immediate, precise number to work with. For example, you might see 0.20% for QQQ. Now, you must contextualize it.
Step 2: Determine "What Is a Good Expense Ratio for an ETF?"
A "good" expense ratio is relative. It depends entirely on the asset class and the complexity of the strategy.
- For broad, passive index ETFs (like an S&P 500 fund), you should expect rock-bottom fees, often 0.03% or lower. In this category, anything above 0.10% is expensive.
- For thematic ETFs (like robotics, clean energy, or Bitcoin ETFs), you will pay more for the specialized access and research, perhaps 0.40% to 0.75%.
- For complex strategies (like covered call ETFs or actively managed funds), fees can approach or exceed 1.00%.
The key is to compare an ETF's fee not to the entire market, but to its direct peers. A 0.50% fee is terrible for an S&P 500 fund but might be a bargain for a well-managed emerging markets bond fund.
Step 3: Analyze If the Fee Is Justified (The R-Squared Test)
This is the most critical step. A fee is only "bad" if the fund fails to deliver on its promise.
For passive index ETFs, the job is to track an index perfectly. We can measure this using R-Squared. R-Squared (R²) measures how closely a fund's performance correlates to its benchmark index, on a scale of 0 to 100.
You can pull this with the ETFRiskRSquared function.
=ETFRiskRSquared("SPY")
For a passive fund like SPY, you'd expect an R-Squared of 99 or 100. If you are paying a 0.20% expense ratio for a fund with an R-Squared of 95, you are paying for active risk (tracking error) you didn't ask for.
For active ETFs, the fee is meant to buy outperformance, or Alpha. If you are paying a high 0.75% fee, you should be looking for a positive alpha. If that fund's alpha is zero or negative, the fee is not justified.
We cover this concept in detail in our guide: Measuring ETF Risk: How to Use Alpha, Beta, and Sharpe Ratio in Excel.
The Long-Term Impact of Fees: A 20-Year Scenario
To truly appreciate the impact of expense ratios, let's quantify what a seemingly small fee difference means over time.
Consider two S&P 500 ETFs with identical holdings but different expense ratios:
- Fund A: 0.03% expense ratio
- Fund B: 0.20% expense ratio
Assuming a $100,000 initial investment and a 10% annual return before fees, here's the outcome after 20 years:
| Metric | Fund A (0.03%) | Fund B (0.20%) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Value | $672,750 | $650,704 | $22,046 |
| Total Fees Paid | $11,000 | $33,046 | $22,046 |
That 0.17% difference in expense ratio costs you $22,046 over 20 years on a $100,000 investment. Scale that across a multi-million dollar portfolio, and the impact becomes enormous.
This is why, for passive index funds, every basis point matters.
Conclusion: From "What Is an ETF Expense Ratio?" to "Is It Worth It?"
For an investment professional, the expense ratio is not just a number; it's the hurdle a fund must clear to earn a spot in your portfolio.
As we discussed in our ETF vs. Mutual Fund comparison, fees are a key differentiator. But they are just one part of the equation.
Before choosing a fund, you must first understand its basic structure, as detailed in our pillar guide, What Is an ETF? A Professional's Guide to Analyzing Funds in Excel. Only then can you use tools like R-Squared and Alpha to determine if a fund's costs are a fair price for its strategy.
And once you've analyzed individual funds, you'll need to understand how they fit together in your portfolio. Our guide on how to build and diversify an ETF portfolio shows you how to construct a portfolio that balances cost efficiency with strategic diversification.
Ready to analyze ETF fees with precision? Start your MarketXLS free trial and access all fund cost analysis functions in Excel.
