ACES vs FFLV
vs
ACES vs FFLV
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 115 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | FFLV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.38% |
| AUM | $119M | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% | 1.41% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 119 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2024-02-09 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | -15.21% | +2.25% |
| YTD Return | +4.73% | +12.69% |
| 1-Year Return | +38.15% | +26.78% |
| 3-Year Return | -6.90% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -13.32% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 59 | 63 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 72 |
| Value Score | 58 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
152
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or FFLV?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FFLV charges 0.38%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and FFLV hold the same stocks?
ACES and FFLV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 152 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or FFLV?
Over the past year, ACES returned +38.15% while FFLV returned +26.78%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.