ACES vs SBIO
vs
ACES vs SBIO
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 90 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $118M | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 59 |
| Value Score | 63 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or SBIO?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and SBIO hold the same stocks?
ACES and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or SBIO?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.