ACES vs SBIO
vs
ACES vs SBIO
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 89 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $118M | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 59 |
| Value Score | 63 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
126
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or SBIO?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and SBIO hold the same stocks?
ACES and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 126 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or SBIO?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.