AOD vs FFLV
vs
AOD vs FFLV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 115 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FFLV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.38% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.41% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 119 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2024-02-09 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | +2.25% |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | +12.69% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | +26.78% |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | - |
| Buy Score | 56 | 63 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 72 |
| Value Score | 50 | - |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or FFLV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FFLV charges 0.38%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and FFLV hold the same stocks?
AOD and FFLV share 19 common holdings with a 14.1% weight overlap. They hold 181 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or FFLV?
Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while FFLV returned +26.78%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.