AWF vs FFLV
vs
AWF vs FFLV
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | FFLV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.38% |
| AUM | $975M | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 1.41% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 119 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2024-02-09 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | +2.25% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +12.69% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +26.78% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 63 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 72 |
| Value Score | 53 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
822
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or FFLV?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while FFLV charges 0.38%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and FFLV hold the same stocks?
AWF and FFLV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 822 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or FFLV?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while FFLV returned +26.78%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.