BBEM vs FFLV
vs
BBEM vs FFLV
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 888 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FFLV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| AUM | $801M | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.41% |
| Holdings Count | 1,132 | 119 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2024-02-09 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.54% | +2.25% |
| YTD Return | +22.43% | +12.69% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.91% | +26.78% |
| 3-Year Return | +23.10% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 82 | 63 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 72 |
| Value Score | 58 | - |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or FFLV?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FFLV charges 0.38%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and FFLV hold the same stocks?
BBEM and FFLV share 4 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. They hold 999 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or FFLV?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +46.91% while FFLV returned +26.78%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.