CGW vs SBIO
vs
CGW vs SBIO
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 90 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 59 |
| Value Score | 52 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or SBIO?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and SBIO hold the same stocks?
CGW and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or SBIO?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.