FAAR vs SBIO
vs
FAAR vs SBIO
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 90 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $165M | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 65 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 59 |
| Value Score | 55 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or SBIO?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and SBIO hold the same stocks?
FAAR and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or SBIO?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.