FAAR vs SBIO
vs
FAAR vs SBIO
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 89 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $165M | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 65 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 59 |
| Value Score | 55 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
93
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or SBIO?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and SBIO hold the same stocks?
FAAR and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 93 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or SBIO?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.