FFLV vs FQAL
vs
FFLV vs FQAL
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $16M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.17% |
| Holdings Count | 119 | 129 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +2.25% | +0.04% |
| YTD Return | +12.69% | +7.80% |
| 1-Year Return | +26.78% | +17.86% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +18.53% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +11.89% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 69 |
| Momentum Score | 72 | 56 |
| Value Score | - | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or FQAL?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and FQAL hold the same stocks?
FFLV and FQAL share 27 common holdings with a 18.8% weight overlap. They hold 212 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or FQAL?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +26.78% while FQAL returned +17.86%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.