FFLV vs MFEM
vs
FFLV vs MFEM
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $16M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 79 |
| Value Score | - | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
820
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or MFEM?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while MFEM charges 0.49%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and MFEM hold the same stocks?
FFLV and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 820 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or MFEM?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.