FFLV vs PATN
vs
FFLV vs PATN
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 132 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $16M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | - | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 74 |
| Value Score | - | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or PATN?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while PATN charges 0.65%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and PATN hold the same stocks?
FFLV and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or PATN?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.