FFLV vs SAWS
vs
FFLV vs SAWS
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 127 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $16M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | - | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 61 |
| Value Score | - | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
197
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or SAWS?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SAWS charges 0.55%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FFLV and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 197 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or SAWS?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while SAWS returned +8.69%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.