FFLV vs SCHQ
vs
FFLV vs SCHQ
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 127 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $16M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 25 |
| Value Score | - | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
137
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or SCHQ?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
FFLV and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 137 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or SCHQ?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.