FFLV vs SPGM
vs
FFLV vs SPGM
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2834 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $16M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 2,954 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | +3.34% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +2.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +23.81% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +19.04% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +12.35% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +5.47% |
| Buy Score | 66 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 59 |
| Value Score | - | 71 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or SPGM?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and SPGM hold the same stocks?
FFLV and SPGM share 64 common holdings with a 13.4% weight overlap. They hold 2897 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or SPGM?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while SPGM returned +23.81%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.