FLGV vs SBIO

vs

Quick Verdict

FLGV has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 89 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLGVSBIO
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)ALPS Advisors
Expense Ratio0.09%0.50%
AUM$1.0B$139M
Dividend Yield3.99%0.00%
Holdings Count4890
Inception Date2020-06-092014-12-30
Investment StyleIntermediate Term US Government BondSmall Cap Growth
1-Month Return+0.10%+0.62%
YTD Return+0.15%+2.63%
1-Year Return+5.85%+64.54%
3-Year Return+2.58%+20.94%
5-Year Return-0.76%-0.63%
10-Year Return-+10.30%
Buy Score7168
Momentum Score2859
Value Score6767

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
132
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FLGV or SBIO?

FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SBIO charges 0.50%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FLGV and SBIO hold the same stocks?

FLGV and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 132 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FLGV or SBIO?

Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.