FLGV vs SBIO

vs

Quick Verdict

FLGV has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 90 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLGVSBIO
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)ALPS Advisors
Expense Ratio0.09%0.50%
AUM$1.0B$139M
Dividend Yield3.99%0.00%
Holdings Count4890
Inception Date2020-06-092014-12-30
Investment StyleIntermediate Term US Government BondSmall Cap Growth
1-Month Return+0.10%+0.62%
YTD Return+0.15%+2.63%
1-Year Return+5.85%+64.54%
3-Year Return+2.58%+20.94%
5-Year Return-0.76%-0.63%
10-Year Return-+10.30%
Buy Score7168
Momentum Score2859
Value Score6767

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FLGV or SBIO?

FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SBIO charges 0.50%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FLGV and SBIO hold the same stocks?

FLGV and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FLGV or SBIO?

Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.