FNGG vs SBIO

vs

Quick Verdict

SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 90 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNGGSBIO
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustALPS Advisors
Expense Ratio0.96%0.50%
AUM$115M$139M
Dividend Yield14.48%0.00%
Holdings Count1890
Inception Date2021-09-292014-12-30
Investment StyleTrading-Leveraged EquitySmall Cap Growth
1-Month Return-6.65%+0.62%
YTD Return-3.76%+2.63%
1-Year Return+1.89%+64.54%
3-Year Return+71.32%+20.94%
5-Year Return--0.63%
10-Year Return-+10.30%
Buy Score4568
Momentum Score959
Value Score6867

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FNGG or SBIO?

FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FNGG and SBIO hold the same stocks?

FNGG and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FNGG or SBIO?

Over the past year, FNGG returned +1.89% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.