FNGG vs SBIO

vs

Quick Verdict

SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 89 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNGGSBIO
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustALPS Advisors
Expense Ratio0.96%0.50%
AUM$115M$139M
Dividend Yield14.48%0.00%
Holdings Count1890
Inception Date2021-09-292014-12-30
Investment StyleTrading-Leveraged EquitySmall Cap Growth
1-Month Return-6.65%+0.62%
YTD Return-3.76%+2.63%
1-Year Return+1.89%+64.54%
3-Year Return+71.32%+20.94%
5-Year Return--0.63%
10-Year Return-+10.30%
Buy Score4568
Momentum Score1159
Value Score-67

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
102
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FNGG or SBIO?

FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FNGG and SBIO hold the same stocks?

FNGG and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 102 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FNGG or SBIO?

Over the past year, FNGG returned +1.89% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.