FQAL vs SBIO
vs
FQAL vs SBIO
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $213M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 129 | 87 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.04% | +18.70% |
| YTD Return | +7.80% | +28.38% |
| 1-Year Return | +17.86% | +114.59% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.53% | +28.44% |
| 5-Year Return | +11.89% | +6.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +11.93% |
| Buy Score | 69 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 56 | 78 |
| Value Score | 73 | 57 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
210
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or SBIO?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SBIO charges 0.50%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and SBIO hold the same stocks?
FQAL and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 210 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or SBIO?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +17.86% while SBIO returned +114.59%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.