GTOS vs SBIO

vs

Quick Verdict

GTOS has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGTOSSBIO
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)ALPS Advisors
Expense Ratio0.30%0.50%
AUM$119M$139M
Dividend Yield4.73%0.00%
Holdings Count50890
Inception Date2022-12-092014-12-30
Investment StyleShort Term High Yield BondSmall Cap Growth
1-Month Return+0.09%+0.62%
YTD Return+0.04%+2.63%
1-Year Return+5.29%+64.54%
3-Year Return+4.99%+20.94%
5-Year Return--0.63%
10-Year Return-+10.30%
Buy Score5268
Momentum Score2659
Value Score-67

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, GTOS or SBIO?

GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SBIO charges 0.50%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do GTOS and SBIO hold the same stocks?

GTOS and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, GTOS or SBIO?

Over the past year, GTOS returned +5.29% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.