GTOS vs SBIO
vs
GTOS vs SBIO
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 294 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $122M | $213M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.55% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 1,047 | 87 |
| Inception Date | 2022-12-09 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Short Term High Yield Bond | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -0.23% | +18.70% |
| YTD Return | +0.92% | +28.38% |
| 1-Year Return | +4.04% | +114.59% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.12% | +28.44% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +6.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +11.93% |
| Buy Score | 59 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 27 | 78 |
| Value Score | - | 57 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
380
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GTOS or SBIO?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SBIO charges 0.50%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GTOS and SBIO hold the same stocks?
GTOS and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 380 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GTOS or SBIO?
Over the past year, GTOS returned +4.04% while SBIO returned +114.59%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.