MFEM vs SBIO
vs
MFEM vs SBIO
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 699 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $145M | $213M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 730 | 87 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -5.75% | +18.70% |
| YTD Return | +20.38% | +28.38% |
| 1-Year Return | +36.47% | +114.59% |
| 3-Year Return | +20.04% | +28.44% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.58% | +6.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +11.93% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 84 | 78 |
| Value Score | 65 | 57 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
785
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or SBIO?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SBIO charges 0.50%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and SBIO hold the same stocks?
MFEM and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 785 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or SBIO?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +36.47% while SBIO returned +114.59%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.