PATN vs SBIO
vs
PATN vs SBIO
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $54M | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 61 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 59 |
| Value Score | 50 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or SBIO?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and SBIO hold the same stocks?
PATN and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or SBIO?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.