PATN vs SBIO
vs
PATN vs SBIO
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $54M | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 90 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | +0.62% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | +2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +64.54% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +20.94% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -0.63% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +10.30% |
| Buy Score | 61 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 59 |
| Value Score | 50 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
189
Total Unique
Top Shared Holdings
| Ticker | PATN Weight | SBIO Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AZN:LN | 2.77% | 0.00% |
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or SBIO?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and SBIO hold the same stocks?
PATN and SBIO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 189 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or SBIO?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while SBIO returned +64.54%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.