SAWS vs SBIO
vs
SAWS vs SBIO
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 86 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWS | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $8M | $197M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 72 | 87 |
| Inception Date | 2024-07-30 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -1.20% | +1.42% |
| YTD Return | +9.79% | +8.15% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.00% | +87.52% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +21.37% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +3.88% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +8.82% |
| Buy Score | 59 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 61 | 59 |
| Value Score | - | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
157
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SAWS or SBIO?
SAWS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SAWS and SBIO hold the same stocks?
SAWS and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 157 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SAWS or SBIO?
Over the past year, SAWS returned +19.00% while SBIO returned +87.52%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.