SBIO vs SCHQ
vs
SBIO vs SCHQ
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 97 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBIO | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $139M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 90 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2014-12-30 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +0.62% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +2.63% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +64.54% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | +20.94% | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.63% | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | +10.30% | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 59 | 25 |
| Value Score | 67 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SBIO or SCHQ?
SBIO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SBIO and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
SBIO and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SBIO or SCHQ?
Over the past year, SBIO returned +64.54% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.