SBIO vs TYLG
vs
SBIO vs TYLG
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 89 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBIO | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $139M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 90 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2014-12-30 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +0.62% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +2.63% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +64.54% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +20.94% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.63% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +10.30% | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 59 | 29 |
| Value Score | 67 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
160
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SBIO or TYLG?
SBIO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while TYLG charges 0.60%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SBIO and TYLG hold the same stocks?
SBIO and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 160 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SBIO or TYLG?
Over the past year, SBIO returned +64.54% while TYLG returned +15.55%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.