SBIO vs TYLG
vs
SBIO vs TYLG
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 90 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBIO | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $139M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 90 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2014-12-30 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +0.62% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +2.63% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +64.54% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +20.94% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.63% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +10.30% | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 59 | 29 |
| Value Score | 67 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SBIO or TYLG?
SBIO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while TYLG charges 0.60%. SBIO is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SBIO and TYLG hold the same stocks?
SBIO and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SBIO or TYLG?
Over the past year, SBIO returned +64.54% while TYLG returned +15.55%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.