AALG vs VTI
AALG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AALG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AALG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -15.46% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.93% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 105.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AALG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AALG returned +29.93% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, AALG is down 15.46% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AALG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 105.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.2% for AALG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AALG charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AALG currently yields 1.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AALG and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AALG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAL | 7.55% | 0.02% | 7.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AALG or VTI?
AALG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AALG or VTI?
Over the past year AALG returned +29.93% vs +24.16% for VTI, so AALG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AALG annualized +15.01% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AALG or VTI?
AALG has been the more volatile fund at 105.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AALG -64.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AALG and VTI?
AALG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AALG and VTI?
AALG and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AALG or VTI?
AALG yields 1.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AALG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.