AAPB vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AAPB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AAPB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.15% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.04% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +50.58% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.84% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 45.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
AAPB vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AAPB returned +50.58% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, AAPB is up 16.04% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, AAPB compounded at +21.84% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, AAPB has the edge at +16.29% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AAPB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.1% for AAPB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AAPB charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AAPB currently yields 4.15% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AAPB and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AAPB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 66.65% | 5.84% | 60.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AAPB or VTI?
AAPB has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AAPB or VTI?
Over the past year AAPB returned +50.58% vs +22.39% for VTI, so AAPB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AAPB annualized +16.29% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AAPB or VTI?
AAPB has been the more volatile fund at 45.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AAPB -58.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AAPB and VTI?
AAPB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AAPB and VTI?
AAPB and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AAPB or VTI?
AAPB yields 4.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AAPB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.