AAPD vs VTI
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AAPD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -12.50% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -23.92% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.61% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
AAPD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF (AAPD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AAPD returned -23.92% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, AAPD is down 12.50% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, AAPD compounded at -16.61% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -15.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AAPD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.0% for AAPD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AAPD charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AAPD currently yields 3.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AAPD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AAPD or VTI?
AAPD has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AAPD or VTI?
Over the past year AAPD returned -23.92% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AAPD annualized -15.16% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AAPD or VTI?
AAPD has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AAPD -63.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AAPD and VTI?
AAPD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AAPD and VTI?
AAPD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AAPD or VTI?
AAPD yields 3.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AAPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.