ABUF vs IVV
Aptus Laddered Buffer ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ABUF or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABUF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.36% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ABUF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ABUF vs IVV Performance
Aptus Laddered Buffer ETF (ABUF) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ABUF is up 10.36% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABUF charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABUF currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in ABUF and 490 in IVV, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in ABUF and 490 in IVV, against full books of 5 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 5 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions ABUF does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABUF and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABUF or IVV?
ABUF has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABUF or IVV?
ABUF yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ABUF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.