ABXB vs VTI
Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABXB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.53% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.17% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.69% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.62% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
ABXB vs VTI Performance
Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABXB returned +1.17% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ABXB is down 1.53% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, ABXB compounded at +5.69% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.62% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.7% for ABXB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.0% for ABXB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABXB charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABXB currently yields 5.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ABXB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABXB or VTI?
ABXB has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABXB or VTI?
Over the past year ABXB returned +1.17% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABXB annualized +0.88% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABXB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.7% for ABXB. Worst drawdown: ABXB -17.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ABXB and VTI?
ABXB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABXB and VTI?
ABXB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABXB or VTI?
ABXB yields 5.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ABXB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.