ACES vs ARKG
ACES vs ARKG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | ARKG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $109M | $1.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | -4.16% | +47.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.72% | +84.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.79% | +9.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.98% | -13.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 36.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -83.6% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Oct 31, 2014 |
ACES vs ARKG Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% while ARKG returned +84.80%. Year to date, ACES is down 4.16% versus a gain of 47.50% for ARKG.
Over three years, ACES compounded at -8.79% per year against +9.13% for ARKG; over five years the annualized figures are -13.98% and -13.10% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ARKG has the edge at +7.65% annualized vs +3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.3% compared with 35.4% for ACES. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -83.6% for ARKG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while ARKG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $75 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 0.00% for ARKG.
Holdings Overlap
ACES and ARKG share 0 holdings out of 68 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or ARKG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while ARKG charges 0.75%. ACES is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or ARKG?
Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% vs +84.80% for ARKG, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ACES annualized +3.76% vs +7.65% for ARKG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or ARKG?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 36.3% annualized versus 35.4% for ACES. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs ARKG -83.6%.
Should I hold both ACES and ARKG?
ACES and ARKG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and ARKG?
ACES and ARKG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 68 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or ARKG?
ACES yields 1.22% while ARKG yields 0.00%, so ACES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.