ACES vs AVNM
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
AVNM has a lower expense ratio. AVNM delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | AVNM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.31% | |
| AUM | $109M | $690M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 2.37% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | -3.74% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | +29.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -7.82% | +22.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.74% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 12.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -14.0% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Avantis Investors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Jun 27, 2023 |
ACES vs AVNM Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is a ETF from Avantis Investors. Over the past year ACES returned +20.63% while AVNM returned +29.45%. Year to date, ACES is down 3.74% versus a gain of 15.00% for AVNM.
Over three years, ACES compounded at -7.82% per year against +22.00% for AVNM. Across the full 3-year window we track, AVNM has the edge at +21.68% annualized vs +3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 12.6% for AVNM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -14.0% for AVNM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while AVNM charges 0.31%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $31 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 2.37% for AVNM.
Holdings Overlap
ACES and AVNM share 0 holdings out of 45 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or AVNM?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while AVNM charges 0.31%. AVNM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or AVNM?
Over the past year ACES returned +20.63% vs +29.45% for AVNM, so AVNM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ACES annualized +3.81% vs +21.68% for AVNM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or AVNM?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 12.6% for AVNM. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs AVNM -14.0%.
Should I hold both ACES and AVNM?
ACES and AVNM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and AVNM?
ACES and AVNM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 45 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or AVNM?
ACES yields 1.22% while AVNM yields 2.37%, so AVNM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.