ACES vs AVSE
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
AVSE has a lower expense ratio. AVSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. AVSE offers more diversification with 1526 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | AVSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.33% | |
| AUM | $109M | $210M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 1.27% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 4,803 | |
| YTD Return | -5.34% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.63% | +32.09% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.28% | +22.32% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -14.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.3% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -26.3% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Avantis Investors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Mar 28, 2022 |
ACES vs AVSE Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) is a ETF from Avantis Investors. Over the past year ACES returned +18.63% while AVSE returned +32.09%. Year to date, ACES is down 5.34% versus a gain of 16.64% for AVSE.
Over three years, ACES compounded at -8.28% per year against +22.32% for AVSE. Across the full 4-year window we track, AVSE has the edge at +13.12% annualized vs +3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.3% compared with 18.3% for AVSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -26.3% for AVSE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while AVSE charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $33 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 1.27% for AVSE.
Holdings Overlap
ACES and AVSE share 0 holdings out of 1563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or AVSE?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while AVSE charges 0.33%. AVSE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or AVSE?
Over the past year ACES returned +18.63% vs +32.09% for AVSE, so AVSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ACES annualized +3.60% vs +13.12% for AVSE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or AVSE?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.3% annualized versus 18.3% for AVSE. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs AVSE -26.3%.
Should I hold both ACES and AVSE?
ACES and AVSE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and AVSE?
ACES and AVSE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or AVSE?
ACES yields 1.22% while AVSE yields 1.27%, so AVSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.