ACES vs GTOS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 294 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | GTOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $109M | $122M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 4.55% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 1,047 | |
| YTD Return | -3.74% | -0.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | +1.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -7.82% | +4.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.74% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Dec 9, 2022 |
ACES vs GTOS Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ACES returned +20.63% while GTOS returned +1.12%. Year to date, ACES is down 3.74% versus a loss of 0.89% for GTOS.
Over three years, ACES compounded at -7.82% per year against +4.61% for GTOS. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.29% annualized vs +3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -1.8% for GTOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while GTOS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $30 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 4.55% for GTOS.
Holdings Overlap
ACES and GTOS share 0 holdings out of 331 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or GTOS?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or GTOS?
Over the past year ACES returned +20.63% vs +1.12% for GTOS, so ACES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ACES annualized +3.81% vs +4.29% for GTOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or GTOS?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs GTOS -1.8%.
Should I hold both ACES and GTOS?
ACES and GTOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and GTOS?
ACES and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 331 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or GTOS?
ACES yields 1.22% while GTOS yields 4.55%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.