ACES vs HCOM
ACES vs HCOM
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. HCOM offers more diversification with 55 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $109M | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | -4.16% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.72% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.79% | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.98% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Sep 14, 2021 |
ACES vs HCOM Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, ACES is down 4.16% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Over three years, ACES compounded at -8.79% per year against -6.95% for HCOM. Across the full 4-year window we track, ACES has the edge at +3.76% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $59 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or HCOM?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while HCOM charges 0.59%. ACES is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or HCOM?
Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so ACES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ACES annualized +3.76% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or HCOM?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both ACES and HCOM?
ACES and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or HCOM?
ACES yields 1.22% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.