ACES vs SAWS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $109M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | -4.16% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.72% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.98% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Jul 30, 2024 |
ACES vs SAWS Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% while SAWS returned +25.78%. Year to date, ACES is down 4.16% versus a gain of 16.18% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 18.3% for SAWS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $55 annually. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or SAWS?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SAWS charges 0.55%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or SAWS?
Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% vs +25.78% for SAWS, so SAWS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ACES annualized +3.76% vs +13.57% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or SAWS?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 18.3% for SAWS. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both ACES and SAWS?
ACES and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and SAWS?
ACES and SAWS share 2 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or SAWS?
ACES yields 1.22% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so ACES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.