ACES vs TLTP
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
TLTP has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | TLTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $109M | $23M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 14.33% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | -3.74% | -9.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | -7.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -7.82% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.74% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 8.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -12.7% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Oct 29, 2024 |
ACES vs TLTP Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year ACES returned +20.63% while TLTP returned -7.78%. Year to date, ACES is down 3.74% versus a loss of 9.12% for TLTP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 8.6% for TLTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -12.7% for TLTP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while TLTP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $39 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 14.33% for TLTP.
Holdings Overlap
ACES and TLTP share 0 holdings out of 40 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or TLTP?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or TLTP?
Over the past year ACES returned +20.63% vs -7.78% for TLTP, so ACES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ACES annualized +3.81% vs -5.23% for TLTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or TLTP?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 8.6% for TLTP. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs TLTP -12.7%.
Should I hold both ACES and TLTP?
ACES and TLTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and TLTP?
ACES and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 40 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or TLTP?
ACES yields 1.22% while TLTP yields 14.33%, so TLTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.