AGRH vs QQQ
iShares Interest Rate Hedged US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, AGRH or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
AGRH has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $8M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 113 | 107 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.5%Best | 19.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.7%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $12,373 | $25,212Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 23 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AGRH has data through Aug 12, 2026 and QQQ through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2022 to Aug 12, 2026 (4.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 1.5% for AGRH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for AGRH and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRH charges 0.13% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $18 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRH currently yields 4.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in AGRH and 102 in QQQ, totalling 97.2% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in AGRH and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 113 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGRH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRH or QQQ?
AGRH has an expense ratio of 0.13% while QQQ charges 0.18%. AGRH is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AGRH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 1.5% for AGRH. Worst drawdown: AGRH -1.7% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both AGRH and QQQ?
AGRH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRH or QQQ?
AGRH yields 4.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so AGRH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than AGRH?
AGRH has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.