AIA vs IVV
iShares Asia 50 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AIA or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AIA led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.0B | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 64 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +41.21%Best | +12.76% |
| 1Y Return | +52.41%Best | +15.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.98%Best | +22.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.58%Best | +13.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -61.1% | -55.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,626Best | $18,869 |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.2% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 13, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2007 to Oct 1, 2026 (18.9 years).
AIA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.9 years both funds cover.
AIA vs IVV Performance
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AIA returned +52.41% while IVV returned +15.57%. Year to date, AIA is up 41.21% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Over three years, AIA compounded at +40.98% per year against +22.95% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +15.58% and +13.54% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.64% annualized vs +6.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.1% for AIA and -55.3% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIA charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIA currently yields 1.54% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of AIA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings AIA also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in AIA and 505 in IVV, against full books of 64 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AIA (99.0% of the fund), and 1 for AIA that do not appear in IVV (15.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.13% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AIA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIA or IVV?
AIA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIA or IVV?
Over the past year AIA returned +52.41% vs +15.57% for IVV, so AIA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AIA annualized +6.46% vs +9.64% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIA or IVV?
AIA has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AIA -61.1% vs IVV -55.3%.
Should I hold both AIA and IVV?
AIA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIA or IVV?
AIA yields 1.54% while IVV yields 1.06%, so AIA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AIA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AIA led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.