AIA vs IVV
iShares Asia 50 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AIA delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.5B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.50% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +36.57% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +65.52% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +36.70% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.12% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 13, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
AIA vs IVV Performance
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AIA returned +65.52% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, AIA is up 36.57% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, AIA compounded at +36.70% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.12% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.1% for AIA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIA charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIA currently yields 1.50% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AIA and IVV share 1 holdings out of 558 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIA or IVV?
AIA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AIA or IVV?
Over the past year AIA returned +65.52% vs +21.64% for IVV, so AIA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AIA annualized +6.32% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AIA or IVV?
AIA has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AIA -61.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AIA and IVV?
AIA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AIA and IVV?
AIA and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 558 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIA or IVV?
AIA yields 1.50% while IVV yields 1.09%, so AIA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.