AIMG vs PFUT

AIMG vs PFUT

Which is better, AIMG or PFUT?

Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Growth.

AIMG has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: AIMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAIMGPFUT
Expense Ratio0.61%Best0.64%
AUM$2M$4M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings172
Volatility (annualized)-20.0%
Max Drawdown--44.9%
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCPutnam Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionSep 9, 2026May 25, 2021

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 136 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AIMG has data through Oct 23, 2026 and PFUT through Jun 9, 2026.

Compare AIMG against instead:AIMG vs SPYAIMG vs QQQAIMG vs VOOAIMG vs VTIPFUT against:PFUT vs VXUS

Fees and Cost Over Time

AIMG charges 0.61% per year while PFUT charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $64 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIMG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PFUT.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in AIMG and 68 in PFUT, totalling 66.9% and 96.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 222 days apart, AIMG as of Oct 7, 2026 and PFUT as of Feb 27, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AIMG and 68 in PFUT, against full books of 1 and 72.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AIMG and PFUT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AIMGPFUT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AIMG or PFUT?

AIMG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while PFUT charges 0.64%. AIMG is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, AIMG or PFUT?

AIMG yields 0.00% while PFUT yields 0.00%, so PFUT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PFUT better than AIMG?

AIMG has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.